參考文獻(xiàn)

[1]哈伯勒．繁榮與蕭條：經(jīng)濟(jì)周期運(yùn)動(dòng)的盛衰交替［M］．朱應(yīng)庚，譯．北京：中央編譯出版社，2011．

[2]漢茲．開放的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論［M］．段文輝，譯．武漢：武漢大學(xué)出版社，2009．

[3]吉爾迪，阿米蒂奇．歷史學(xué)宣言［M］．孫岳，譯．上海：格致出版社、上海人民出版社，2007．

[4]賈根良．報(bào)酬遞增經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)：回顧與展望（1）［J］．南開經(jīng)濟(jì)研究，1998（6）．

[5]賈根良．中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)革命論［J］．社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線，2006（1）．

[6]賈根良．“新經(jīng)濟(jì)思想史”芻議［J］．社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線，2010（1）．

[7]賴納特，達(dá)斯特．替代性教規(guī)：文藝復(fù)興經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)史［M］//窮國(guó)的國(guó)富論：演化發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)論文選（上卷）．賈根良，主編．賈根良，等，譯．北京：高等教育出版社，2007．

[8]勞丹．進(jìn)步及其問題（第2版）［M］．劉新民，譯．北京：華夏出版社，1998．

[9]李黎力．“明斯基時(shí)刻”之考辨［J］．經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理，2013（7）．

[10]李黎力．“大衰退”以來明斯基思潮之動(dòng)向——一個(gè)批判性評(píng)述［J］．經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論，2014（1）．

[11]李黎力．明斯基的“華爾街圖景”［J］．政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)評(píng)論，2017（5）．

[12]李黎力．明斯基的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究方法論［J］．當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究，2017（6）．

[13]李黎力．明斯基金融不穩(wěn)定性假說評(píng)析［J］．國(guó)際金融研究，2017（6）．

[14]李黎力．明斯基與主流經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)：淵源與分化［J］．經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理，2017（7）．

[15]李黎力．明斯基經(jīng)濟(jì)思想研究［M］．北京：商務(wù)印書館，2018．

[16]李黎力．“明斯基時(shí)刻”的前世今生［N］．經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào)，2018-01-31．

[17]李黎力．經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究的范式及演進(jìn)［M］//PPE導(dǎo)論．姚新中，主編．北京：中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，2019．

[18]李黎力．明斯基與后凱恩斯主義：淵源和比較．中華外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說研究會(huì)年會(huì)會(huì)議論文，2019．

[19]李黎力，賈根良．經(jīng)濟(jì)思想編史學(xué)：學(xué)科性質(zhì)、內(nèi)容與意義［J］．經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài)，2017（11）．

[20]李黎力，沈梓鑫．經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)向何處去——金融危機(jī)以來的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)反思［J］．經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理，2012（7）．

[21]李黎力，張紅梅．明斯基研究傳統(tǒng)：經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)所忽視的金融泡沫研究傳統(tǒng)［J］．經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家，2013（9）．

[22]羅斯巴德．亞當(dāng)·斯密以前的經(jīng)濟(jì)思想：奧地利學(xué)派視角下的經(jīng)濟(jì)思想史（第一卷）［M］．張鳳林，等，譯．北京：商務(wù)印書館，2012．

[23]斯諾登，文．宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)百科詞典［M］．安佳，等，譯．南京：江蘇人民出版社，2011．

[24]特維德．逃不開的經(jīng)濟(jì)周期［M］．董裕平，譯．北京：中信出版社，2012．

[25]夏佛林．經(jīng)濟(jì)周期［M］//新帕爾格雷夫貨幣金融大辭典（第一卷）．紐曼，米爾蓋特，伊特韋爾，主編．王曙光，譯．北京：經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué)出版社，2000．

[26]ANDERSON, GARY, ROBERT TOLLISON. Dead Men Tell No Tales［J］. History of Economics Society Bulletin, 1986, 8(1): 59-68.

[27]BLAUG, MARK. History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists［J］. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2001, 15(1): 145-64.

[28]CESARANO, FLIPPO. On the Role of the History of Economic Analysis［J］. History of Political Economy, 1983, 15(1): 63-82.

[29]DAVIS, JOHN. Mark Blaug on the Historiography of Economics［J］. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 2013, 6(3): 44-63.

[30]HEILBRONER, ROBERT. Modern Economics as a Chapter in the History of Economic Thought［J］. History of Political Economy, 1979, 11(2): 192-198.

[31]KING J E. Post Keynesian Economics［Z］//The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (3rd edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018: 10520-10532.

[32]KURZ, HEINZ. Whither the History of Economic Thought? Going Nowhere Rather Slowly?［J］. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2006, 13(4): 463-488.

[33]LEE, FREDERIC S. Heterodox Economics［Z］//The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (3rd edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018: 5790-5796.

[34]LEIJONHUFVUD, AXEL. The Use of the Past. Invited Lecture at the Meetings of the European Society for the History of Economic Thought. Portugal: O-porto, 2006-04.

[35]MEDIO A. Trade Cycle［Z］//The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (3rd edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018: 13744-13754.

[36]ROMER, PAUL. The Trouble with Macroeconomics［J］. The American Economist, 2019.

[37]RONCAGLIA, ALESSANDRO. Why should Economists Study the History of Economic Thought?［J］. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1996, 3(2): 296-309.

[38]TOBIN, JAMES. Comments on“Stabilize an Unstable Economy”［J］. Journal of Economic Literature, 1989(3): 105-108.

[39]ZARNOWITZ, VICTOR. Recent Work on Business Cycles in Historical Perspective: A Review of Theories and Evidence［J］. Journal of Economic Literature, 1985, 23(2): 523-580.

---

(1)本文系教育部“黨的創(chuàng)新理論引領(lǐng)貫穿理論經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)知識(shí)體系研究”重大專項(xiàng)課題（19JZDZ002）的階段性成果。

(2)李黎力，中國(guó)人民大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院副教授，經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)博士。

(3)關(guān)于庫(kù)恩的“范式”理論在經(jīng)濟(jì)思想史當(dāng)中的應(yīng)用，可參見李黎力（2019a）。