官术网_书友最值得收藏!

The data volume

A company can easily have thousands to millions of IoT devices with several sensors on each unit, each sensor reporting values on a regular basis. The inflow of data can grow quite large very quickly. Since IoT devices send data on an ongoing basis, the volume of data in total can increase much faster than many companies are used to.

To demonstrate how this can happen, imagine a company that manufactures small monitoring devices. It produces 12,000 devices a year, starting in 2010 when the product was launched. Each one is tested at the end of assembly and the values reported by the sensors on the device are kept for analysis for five years. The data growth looks like the following image:

A chart showing data storage needs for production snapshot of 200 KB and 1,000 units per month. Five years of production data is kept

Now, imagine the device also had internet connectivity to track sensor values, and each one remains connected for two years. Since the data inflow continues well after the devices are built, data growth is exponential until it stabilizes when older devices stop reporting values. This looks more like the blue area in the following chart:

Chart shows the addition of IoT data at 0.5 KB per message, 10 messages per day. Devices are connected for two years from production

In order to illustrate how large this can get, consider the following example. If you capture 10 messages per day and the message size is half of a full production snapshot, by 2017, data storage requirements would be over 1,500 times higher than production-only data.

For many companies, this introduces some problems. The database software, storage infrastructure, and available computing horsepower is not typically intended to handle this kind of growth. The licensing agreements with software vendors tends to be tied to the number of servers and CPU cores. Storage is handled by standard backup planning and retention policies.

The data volume rapidly leads to computing and storage requirements well beyond what can be held by a single server. It gets cost prohibitive very quickly under traditional architectures to distribute it across hundreds or thousands of servers. To do the best analytics, you need lots of historical data, and since you are unlikely to know ahead of time which data is most predictive, you have to keep as much as you can on hand.

With large-scale data, computing horsepower requirements for analytics are not very predictable and change dramatically depending on the question being asked. Analytic needs are very elastic. Traditional server planning ratchets up on premise resources with the anticipated number of servers needed to meet peak needs determined in advance. Doubling compute power in a short amount of time, if even possible, is very expensive.

IoT data volumes and computing resource requirements can quickly outpace all the other company data needs combined.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 卓资县| 军事| 进贤县| 巴中市| 浠水县| 东阿县| 浦东新区| 嵊州市| 克拉玛依市| 额敏县| 德保县| 长乐市| 景泰县| 康马县| 新绛县| 汉川市| 兴安盟| 项城市| 长治县| 开江县| 思茅市| 中山市| 青龙| 宝山区| 汕头市| 沅江市| 涟源市| 福鼎市| 松溪县| 卓资县| 白水县| 土默特右旗| 五大连池市| 宜宾县| 锦屏县| 云龙县| 平南县| 东台市| 黄梅县| 遂昌县| 榆树市|