官术网_书友最值得收藏!

Cybersecurity versus IoT security

IoT security is not traditional cybersecurity, but a fusion of cybersecurity with other engineering disciplines. It addresses much more than mere data, servers, network infrastructure, and information security. Rather, it includes the direct or distributed monitoring and/or control of the state of physical systems connected over the internet. Cybersecurity, if you like that term at all, frequently does not address the physical and security aspects of the hardware device or the physical world interactions it can have. Digital control of physical processes over networks makes the IoT unique in that the security equation is limited not only to the basic information assurance principles of confidentiality, integrity, non-repudiation, and so on, but also to the physical resources and machines that originate and receive that information in the real world. In other words, the IoT has very real analog and physical elements. IoT devices are physical things, many of which are safety-related. Therefore, if such devices are compromised, it may lead to physical harm of persons and property, even death.

The subject of IoT security, then, is not the application of a single, static set of meta-security rules as they apply to networked devices and hosts. It requires a unique application for each system and system-of-systems in which IoT devices participate. Anything physical today can be connected to the internet with the appropriate electronic interfaces. The security of the IoT device is then a function of the device's use, the physical process or state impacted by or controlled by the device, and the sensitivity of the systems to which the device connects.

Cyber-physical and many IoT systems frequently invoke an intersection of safety and security engineering, two disciplines that have developed on very different evolutionary paths but which possess partially overlapping goals. We will delve more into safety aspects of IoT security engineering later in this book, but for now we point out an elegantly expressed distinction between safety and security provided by the noted academic Dr. Barry Boehm, Axelrod, W. C., Engineering Safe and Secure Software Systems, p.61, Massachusetts, Artech House, 2013. He poignantly but beautifully expressed the relationship as follows:

  • Safety: The system must not harm the world
  • Security: The world must not harm the system

Hence, it is clear that the IoT and IoT security are much more complex than traditional networks, hosts, and cybersecurity. Safety-conscious industries such as aerospace have evolved highly effective safety engineering approaches and standards because aircraft can harm the world and the people in it. The aircraft industry today, like the automotive industry, is now playing catch-up with regard to security because of the accelerating growth of network connectivity to their vehicles.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 四子王旗| 安远县| 岳西县| 米林县| 青冈县| 广德县| 横山县| 新津县| 巴青县| 德阳市| 敖汉旗| 赫章县| 枞阳县| 梁河县| 芦溪县| 大邑县| 额敏县| 休宁县| 清水河县| 广东省| 昭平县| 大足县| 连南| 浪卡子县| 于都县| 邳州市| 宜兰市| 馆陶县| 高淳县| 墨竹工卡县| 县级市| 秭归县| 磐石市| 光泽县| 隆化县| 蓝田县| 郴州市| 麟游县| 杭锦后旗| 揭阳市| 黎川县|